المدة الزمنية 18:30
LUMIX S5 Officially Unveiled So Now What
تم نشره في 2020/09/03
I'm a hybrid-style shooter with a love of photography but a heavy emphasis on cinematic video. My opinions are based on a 10+ year career of producing video content professionally but that doesn't mean my suggestions are always right for every production or individual. There's plenty of room to disagree and approach projects from a variety of different perspectives. My Current Gear Picks: LUMIX S1H: https://amzn.to/30IlqYY SONY A7S III: https://amzn.to/2DCSf0I APUTURE 300D MKII: https://amzn.to/2DUqX5H GODOX VL300: https://amzn.to/2DN8k3M CAMLINK: https://amzn.to/2XK88t1 If you're curious about new gear, I recommend using Lensrentals to try before you buy. If you use my affiliate link, it's a free and easy way to help support my channel: https://bit.ly/3gMNBeW Click here to subscribe to the channel: /user/StronzVanderploeg If you enjoyed the video and would like to help support the channel, please consider subscribing at SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/stronz-vanderploeg
الفئة
عرض المزيد
مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة على LUMIX S5 Officially Unveiled So Now What:
![SAFIRA INEMA ft DJ AYACH | MENDEM KANGEN [Official Music Video] The Best Wahana Musik](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4r19CTj5_f0/mqdefault.jpg)
I understand that what I shoot seems weird because everyone poops on contrast detect, but I don't have any probs with it. I'm sure there's systems that do it better, but there's nothing wrong with how Lumix does.
I thought I would upgrade directly to an S5 after trading in my remaining m43 gear, but having to deal with two different types of batteries again seems weird to me for using the same system. So that's that. I'm going to wait until and S1 mkii, or whatever, just because I don't wanna' deal with two types of batteries. Those things are wildly expensive.
Professionally, the size of a smaller body doesn't really matter to me because I shoot with a dual blackrapid, but I've been trying to use the S1 and the 50mm 1.4 as a travel companion recently, and nope. That doesn't work. It's not the body's fault, it's the weight of that damn tank of a lens.
Watch I think everyone is gonna to trade their S5 for GH6. I Guarantee!
Gh6 V LOG, APS
12 STOP DYNAMIC RANGE! FULL HD AT 240FPS AT 8 BIT. ( WISHFUL THINKING )
I don’t care about super shallow depth of field. But those features are very impressive given the price of this camera. Also the image quality is excelent.
IMO it's the best hybrid camera for those who don't need a perfect AF system.
Check out what a GH5 can do if you work within it's limits.
We now have a FF camera (A7SIII) that has amazing AF (when you need it; you can turn it off), 4K up-to 120p with AF(!), ALL-I, 10-bit, better body, a decent size in the hand, tons of lenses, OK IBIS.
A7IV will probably be 4K up-to 60p with AF and 10-bit. Maybe not ALL-I.
None of the Lumix FF cameras are attractive right now. All of their traditional advantages are now gone! Anamorphic is incredibly niche, everybody has 10bit 4K now, everybody has good color science, everybody now has some kind of IBIS that is effective in some degree (I still think Panasonic does it the best). ....وسعت 1
Panasonic Lumix: Crappy AF
Sony: A7Siii 1
Add it all up - ridiculously bad autofocus, tiny HDMI port, worst in class IBIS, lack of cheap fast primes, virtual lack of any lenses with stabilization, no intra-frame recording, lack of better pre-amp control (as seen in the S1H), a big crop on slo-mo footage, no improvement to color science, yet another type of battery to deal with, cables still blocking the flip out screen, poor EFV - and you have a camera that is vastly over-priced if the goal was to attract new buyers.
Maybe Canon can get away with a micro HDMI port and other cripplings while charging a premium price, but Panasonic can't.
I understand that what I shoot seems weird because everyone poops on contrast detect, but I don't have any probs with it. I'm sure there's systems that do it better, but there's nothing wrong with how Lumix does.
I thought I would upgrade directly to an S5 after trading in my remaining m43 gear, but having to deal with two different types of batteries again seems weird to me for using the same system. So that's that. I'm going to wait until and S1 mkii, or whatever, just because I don't wanna' deal with two types of batteries. Those things are wildly expensive.
Professionally, the size of a smaller body doesn't really matter to me because I shoot with a dual blackrapid, but I've been trying to use the S1 and the 50mm 1.4 as a travel companion recently, and nope. That doesn't work. It's not the body's fault, it's the weight of that damn tank of a lens.
Watch I think everyone is gonna to trade their S5 for GH6. I Guarantee!
Gh6 V LOG, APS
12 STOP DYNAMIC RANGE! FULL HD AT 240FPS AT 8 BIT. ( WISHFUL THINKING )
I don’t care about super shallow depth of field. But those features are very impressive given the price of this camera. Also the image quality is excelent.
IMO it's the best hybrid camera for those who don't need a perfect AF system.
Check out what a GH5 can do if you work within it's limits.
We now have a FF camera (A7SIII) that has amazing AF (when you need it; you can turn it off), 4K up-to 120p with AF(!), ALL-I, 10-bit, better body, a decent size in the hand, tons of lenses, OK IBIS.
A7IV will probably be 4K up-to 60p with AF and 10-bit. Maybe not ALL-I.
None of the Lumix FF cameras are attractive right now. All of their traditional advantages are now gone! Anamorphic is incredibly niche, everybody has 10bit 4K now, everybody has good color science, everybody now has some kind of IBIS that is effective in some degree (I still think Panasonic does it the best). ....وسعت 1
Add it all up - ridiculously bad autofocus, tiny HDMI port, worst in class IBIS, lack of cheap fast primes, virtual lack of any lenses with stabilization, no intra-frame recording, lack of better pre-amp control (as seen in the S1H), a big crop on slo-mo footage, no improvement to color science, yet another type of battery to deal with, cables still blocking the flip out screen, poor EFV - and you have a camera that is vastly over-priced if the goal was to attract new buyers.
Maybe Canon can get away with a micro HDMI port and other cripplings while charging a premium price, but Panasonic can't.